Holiday Check-in

Things that I did over the long Thanksgiving weekend, beginning Wednesday:
  • Finished the first sleeve on the sweater I'm knitting; started the second
  • Listened to George MacDonald's The Princess and Curdie (1883)
  • Wrote two blog posts ("10,000 Hours" and "The Eternal Feminine")
  • Went grocery shopping for Thanksgiving dinner
  • Watched the BBC production of Gaudy Night (1987)
  • Cooked (Thursday morning, 8:30am-1:30pm)
  • Listened to Tennyson's Idylls of the King (composed 1833-1874), with biographical introduction and critical discussion
  • Went over to friends' home for dinner; ate dinner
  • Watched The Wizard of Oz (1939)
  • Talked with my sister and my mother on the phone
  • Finished Andrew Greeley's Myths of Religion (1977)
  • Watched High Fidelity (2000) and O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000)
  • Started Lord Dunsany's The King of Elfland's Daughter (1924) and Kathleen Norris's The Cloister Walk (1997)
  • Went to a yoga class; stayed for fencing practice
  • Wrote several long emails to friends
  • Finally cleared the boxes out of the front hallway that my mother brought in April
  • Watched Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986)
  • Went to church, made an Advent wreath with my son
  • Helped my husband remove the bolts from the toilet cistern
  • Did laundry
  • Went shopping with my husband and son for a new Christmas tree (artificial, I'm afraid)
  • Put up tree and lights, started on decorations
Now, you tell me, why is it that I feel like I didn't do anything?

Comments

  1. UnknownDecember 1, 2008 at 9:46 PM

    Hmmm. Tough one. But since you ask (unless you were being rhetorical), you may feel that way b/c everything on your list--save for the excellent blog posts--was done for your or your family's benefit, not for some outside group or organization. Hence, the 'recognition' is different. My wife has asked me the same question for 27 years, and I never feel as though I have an adequate response. 'You're keeping our family together and rearing our children,' I say. Though compelling to me, that reply is usually not warmly received.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fencing BearDecember 2, 2008 at 8:37 AM

    Jeff,

    It's interesting that both I and your wife seem to have the same anxiety about "doing enough." This is exactly the question I was asking: why do we have this anxiety when it is clear we are doing so much (cooking, cleaning, shopping for food, participating in the community, caring for family and friends)? What "counts" as "doing something" and what doesn't--and why?

    I'm glad you enjoyed the blog posts!

    ReplyDelete
  3. cindyred60December 2, 2008 at 3:49 PM

    Maybe there's a little something missing from your list.
    from Luke 10... Mary, who sat at the Lord's feet listening to what he said...only one thing is needed...she has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken away from her.

    Heck, she wasn't even making an advent wreath! :)
    When I teach at the Old Folks Home, I like to use this text and start with the question, "Who here spends alot of time just sitting?"

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownDecember 6, 2008 at 8:08 AM

    Hi, thanks for the reply. I just wanted to be sure you understood I was in no way criticizing your choices--indeed, but for swapping out a movie title here and there (Ferris Bueller?), I could easily see myself similarly occupied. My point, which you pick up on in your reply, is that you are indeed serving your family by doing these things, but our reward system (intrinsic or otherwise) is not calibrated to recognize the vital role you play by doing 'little' things.

    I feel somewhat admonished when my wife complains that she hasn't 'gotten anything done' even though she's spent her day and energy doing all manner of things that are necessary for the livelihood of the family. I feel as though I contribute to her feeling that way by not counteracting the implicit reward system of upper middle class America and explaining the benefit that derives to those she loves by doing those 'little' things. [n.b., I am in no way implying that your no doubt good, and 'genius' husband lacks the precision in his feedback that I obviously do in mine.]

    ReplyDelete
  5. Fencing BearDecember 7, 2008 at 7:53 AM

    Cindy,

    I agree. See post now on "The Work of God."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my blog post. I look forward to hearing what you think!

F.B.

Popular posts from this blog

Draco Layer Four: The Anagogic or Mystical Sense

Image
Here be dragons. And doves. Human beings long for transcendence. Such longing is, for the world, always out of fashion because, of course, it is not a longing for the world, and the world knows it. We know what the world wants. The world—by which we mean Satan, the Lord of the World—wants above all our obedience, a jewel so precious that he will do anything to get it: lie, steal, murder, bear false witness, pretend to social standing, pretend to insider knowledge to get us to consent to his influence.  “God lied to you. You will not die.” And suddenly we are anxious about having other people dislike us, about losing prestige in our social circles, about other people being more popular or influential or successful, about other people having secret knowledge, about our own influence and fame. “You shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” And with that temptation, our first parents fell. The irony is cosmic. There they were in the Garden, privy to conversation with God face-to-face, ...
Keep reading

Talking Points: Three Cheers for White Men

Image
1. When white women (see Marie de France and Eleanor of Aquitaine) invented chivalry and courtly love , white men agreed that it was better for knights to spend their time protecting women rather than raping them, and even agreed to write songs for them rather than expecting them to want to have sex with them without being forced. 2. When white men who were celibate (see the canon lawyers and theologians of the twelfth century and thereafter) argued that marriage was a sacrament valid only if both the man and the woman consented , white men exerted themselves to become good husbands rather than expecting women to live as their slaves. 3. When white women (see Christine de Pizan, Mary Wollstonecraft, and the suffragettes) invented feminism , white men supported them (see John Stuart Mill) and even went so far as to vote (because only men could vote at the time) to let them vote, not to mention hiring them as workers and supporting their education. And before you start telling me a...
Keep reading

How to Signal You Are Not a White Supremacist

Image
Professor Kim READ FIRST:  Why Dorothy Kim Hates Me , The Color of the House of the Lord It’s back to class for those of us who teach in medieval studies, and my medievalist colleague Dorothy Kim , Assistant Professor of English at Vassar College ( pictured in 2014 ), wants to make sure you understand the stakes . The medieval western European Christian past is being weaponized by white supremacist/white nationalist/KKK/nazi extremist groups who also frequently happen to be college students.  That does sound bad. But, wait, it gets worse! Don’t think western European medieval studies is exceptional.... ISIS/ISIL also weaponizes the idea of the pure medieval Islamic past in their recruiting rhetoric for young male Muslims. If the medieval past (globally) is being weaponized for the aims of extreme, violent supremacist groups, what are you doing, medievalists, in your classrooms? Because you are the authorities teaching medieval subjects in the classroom, you are, in ...
Keep reading

Draco Layer Three: The Moral or Tropological Sense

Image
Learn to discern. We all know what sin is, right? Right?!  Once upon a time in the desert , the hermit Evagrius Ponticus (d. 399) set out to make a list of the most deadly ones, albeit he called them “deadly thoughts,” not “sins.” You probably know the list, even if you don’t think you do: gluttony, impurity (a.k.a. lust), avarice (a.k.a. greed), sadness (a.k.a. feeling sorry for oneself), anger or wrath, acedia  or sloth, vainglory, and pride (two different things).  Not quite the list you were expecting? That is because some centuries later—we’re talking ancient times here, when centuries passed like decades do now (or vice versa)—Pope Gregory the Great (d. 604) revised the list, somewhat accidentally, in his commentary on Job.  Gregory had been expounding Job according to its multiple layers—yes, that’s right! Job, like Shrek, has layers! —and he happened somewhere in book XXXI to mention the “seven principle vices” to which Pride,  the “Queen of S...
Keep reading

What's in a name?

I knew it was a mistake involving myself in political commentary*, but having taken the plunge, I guess I have to keep swimming, at least until the election. One of the things that has mystified me for years is how the label "liberal" came to be associated with support for government regulation of business, e.g. environmental and worker protection measures, or even (heaven forbid) financial transactions. I know that my colleagues in political science would have an answer to this, and I suspect it goes back to sometime in the 1980s, when Berke Breathed did all those comics about the General [my bad: the Major; it's been a long time] and Milo hunting liberals in the meadows of Bloom County. But knowing the little that I do about the history of the concept of liberalism as it developed in the 19th century, I must confess myself rather confused. This is the way John Stuart Mill (as Wikipedia puts it, "one of the first champions of modern 'liberalism'") s...
Keep reading