An Open Letter to the President and Provost of the University of Chicago: Save Our School

Originally sent directly by email Wednesday, January 12, 2022, from Professor Rachel Fulton Brown, Department of History, The University of Chicago

Dear Paul and Ka Yee,

The mainstream narrative is starting to shift. We are going to lose our brand if it shifts and we are not in front of it. WE are the University of Chicago. WE ask the Big Questions and risk being out on the edge of scientific research. WE are the scholars who do not simply follow the trends, but set them. 

We have embarrassed ourselves for too long—ever since we fell in step with everyone else over the fear. WE should have been the ones with faculty publishing op-eds calling for transparency in testing, not the ones locking our students in their dorm rooms. WE should have been the ones signing the Great Barrington Declaration and siding with SCIENTISTS and DOCTORS who have been willing to risk their careers rather than let their patients die because they wouldn't treat them except at the government’s direction.

NOW is the time. NOW is the time for US, the University of Chicago, to stand out. Or be buried in the avalanche of lawsuits that is surely coming. 

Some things you could do IMMEDIATELY: 

1. MAKE PUBLIC that you have granted exemptions to those of us who refused to consent to being part of a giant experiment which from the beginning has been compromised by politics and haste. 

2. MAKE PUBLIC which of our faculty were courageous enough to sign the Great Barrington Declaration and stand for SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY over POLITICAL GRANDSTANDING.

3. MAKE PUBLIC that we have students intelligent enough to see through the gaslighting and fear to the real questions we should be asking about what it means to be a great school.

PLEASE. SAVE OUR SCHOOL. THIS IS UP TO YOU. Trust me, I have been on the receiving end of protests from our alumni. They don’t pull punches.

Rachel

P.S. If you doubt me, this op-ed from one of Emily’s field colleagues in Tel Aviv makes the argument better than I could: https://swprs.org/professor-ehud-qimron-ministry-of-health-its-time-to-admit-failure/


Sent from my iPad

It’s not too late! Sign the Great Barrington Declaration today. 

Read what our students are saying over at The Chicago Thinker. 

Check out these many early treatment options. 

Live up to our brand. Get out in front of the curve. Stop the vaccine mandates and asymptomatic testing, get rid of the lockdowns and masks, and let us back into the classroom to study and learn. 

We are the School of the Phoenix, not of lab rats or mice. 

Comments

  1. whitewallJanuary 14, 2022 at 8:07 AM

    Fabulous!

    Robert

    ReplyDelete
  2. EgilmerJanuary 16, 2022 at 2:44 PM

    I applaud your letter and the sentiments behind it. That it comes from you is no surprise, I have watched your courage and grace over the years with real admiration. As rare as courage is in academia, however, it is even harder to locate in administrative circles. There is a reason why powers that subscribe to failed policy double down on their failure even after their foundation begins to crumble: panic. They are unlikely to suddenly see reason, for they were probably always aware of more plausible narratives, no they will keep their heads down, remain silent, tacitly lending their support behind failed and failing policy narratives that have and will continue to cost lives, for the simple reason that they hope to evade personal blame by being invisible. There is nothing more horrifying to an administrator than a public mea culpa, and nothing, not even the certainty of the revelation of their cowardice that can convince them to take such a step. They were one among many and pray that will be enough to save them. But keep fighting the good fight. Gott mit uns.

    ReplyDelete
  3. jaynieJanuary 25, 2022 at 12:18 PM

    Good points all. The University is lucky to have had you show them a way through to the other side. Here's hoping that, against type, the administrators pay heed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. whitewallJanuary 29, 2022 at 11:27 AM

    Rachel, I assume you know him? University of Chicago associate professor Dorian Abbot takes a stand against Wokeism.

    Robert

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fencing BearJanuary 29, 2022 at 11:29 AM

      Yes, of course! We have a website and everything: http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~abbot/free.html

      Delete
    2. whitewallJanuary 29, 2022 at 11:57 AM

      I see. You are in good company it seems.

      Delete
  5. KCFebruary 1, 2022 at 10:20 AM

    I hope the Administration finds their courage and speaks up. The truth really does set one free.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownFebruary 14, 2022 at 10:54 AM

      depends on whether the admin is infiltrated with enough executives to deny any scientific investigation

      Delete
  6. whitewallFebruary 24, 2022 at 10:26 AM

    I'm not sure this is in keeping with UC's free speech tradition?
    https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/02/student-columnist-at-u-chicago-fired-after-challenging-fellow-columnist-to-debate-over-mask-mandates/

    Robert

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my blog post. I look forward to hearing what you think!

F.B.

Popular posts from this blog

Draco Layer Four: The Anagogic or Mystical Sense

Image
Here be dragons. And doves. Human beings long for transcendence. Such longing is, for the world, always out of fashion because, of course, it is not a longing for the world, and the world knows it. We know what the world wants. The world—by which we mean Satan, the Lord of the World—wants above all our obedience, a jewel so precious that he will do anything to get it: lie, steal, murder, bear false witness, pretend to social standing, pretend to insider knowledge to get us to consent to his influence.  “God lied to you. You will not die.” And suddenly we are anxious about having other people dislike us, about losing prestige in our social circles, about other people being more popular or influential or successful, about other people having secret knowledge, about our own influence and fame. “You shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” And with that temptation, our first parents fell. The irony is cosmic. There they were in the Garden, privy to conversation with God face-to-face, ...
Keep reading

Talking Points: Three Cheers for White Men

Image
1. When white women (see Marie de France and Eleanor of Aquitaine) invented chivalry and courtly love , white men agreed that it was better for knights to spend their time protecting women rather than raping them, and even agreed to write songs for them rather than expecting them to want to have sex with them without being forced. 2. When white men who were celibate (see the canon lawyers and theologians of the twelfth century and thereafter) argued that marriage was a sacrament valid only if both the man and the woman consented , white men exerted themselves to become good husbands rather than expecting women to live as their slaves. 3. When white women (see Christine de Pizan, Mary Wollstonecraft, and the suffragettes) invented feminism , white men supported them (see John Stuart Mill) and even went so far as to vote (because only men could vote at the time) to let them vote, not to mention hiring them as workers and supporting their education. And before you start telling me a...
Keep reading

How to Signal You Are Not a White Supremacist

Image
Professor Kim READ FIRST:  Why Dorothy Kim Hates Me , The Color of the House of the Lord It’s back to class for those of us who teach in medieval studies, and my medievalist colleague Dorothy Kim , Assistant Professor of English at Vassar College ( pictured in 2014 ), wants to make sure you understand the stakes . The medieval western European Christian past is being weaponized by white supremacist/white nationalist/KKK/nazi extremist groups who also frequently happen to be college students.  That does sound bad. But, wait, it gets worse! Don’t think western European medieval studies is exceptional.... ISIS/ISIL also weaponizes the idea of the pure medieval Islamic past in their recruiting rhetoric for young male Muslims. If the medieval past (globally) is being weaponized for the aims of extreme, violent supremacist groups, what are you doing, medievalists, in your classrooms? Because you are the authorities teaching medieval subjects in the classroom, you are, in ...
Keep reading

Draco Layer Three: The Moral or Tropological Sense

Image
Learn to discern. We all know what sin is, right? Right?!  Once upon a time in the desert , the hermit Evagrius Ponticus (d. 399) set out to make a list of the most deadly ones, albeit he called them “deadly thoughts,” not “sins.” You probably know the list, even if you don’t think you do: gluttony, impurity (a.k.a. lust), avarice (a.k.a. greed), sadness (a.k.a. feeling sorry for oneself), anger or wrath, acedia  or sloth, vainglory, and pride (two different things).  Not quite the list you were expecting? That is because some centuries later—we’re talking ancient times here, when centuries passed like decades do now (or vice versa)—Pope Gregory the Great (d. 604) revised the list, somewhat accidentally, in his commentary on Job.  Gregory had been expounding Job according to its multiple layers—yes, that’s right! Job, like Shrek, has layers! —and he happened somewhere in book XXXI to mention the “seven principle vices” to which Pride,  the “Queen of S...
Keep reading

What's in a name?

I knew it was a mistake involving myself in political commentary*, but having taken the plunge, I guess I have to keep swimming, at least until the election. One of the things that has mystified me for years is how the label "liberal" came to be associated with support for government regulation of business, e.g. environmental and worker protection measures, or even (heaven forbid) financial transactions. I know that my colleagues in political science would have an answer to this, and I suspect it goes back to sometime in the 1980s, when Berke Breathed did all those comics about the General [my bad: the Major; it's been a long time] and Milo hunting liberals in the meadows of Bloom County. But knowing the little that I do about the history of the concept of liberalism as it developed in the 19th century, I must confess myself rather confused. This is the way John Stuart Mill (as Wikipedia puts it, "one of the first champions of modern 'liberalism'") s...
Keep reading